Revelation and the Science of Religion: Between Positivism and Postmodernism

Authors

  • Alexey M. Gaginsky Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. Goncharnaya Str. 12/1, Moscow 109240, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2587-683X-2018-2-2-155-163

Keywords:

revelation, faith, religion, science, methodology, postmodernism, scholasticism

Abstract

The article deals with the book by A.V. Appolonov “The Science of Religion and Its Postmodern Critics” (2018), in which the author investigates both the methodological issues, associated with the discipline, and the opposition of religion and revelation. A.V. Appolonov criticizes many scholars, both well-known classics (K. Bart), and lesser-known but recognized authorities (W.K. Smith), as well as a number of Russian researchers. A.V. Appolonov defends the view that religion can be the object of an impartial analysis only if we a priori exclude the idea of supernatural revelation. The article will raise the question of how A.V. Appolonov justifies this approach to the study of religion and on what methodological preconditions it can be based.

Author Biography

  • Alexey M. Gaginsky, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. Goncharnaya Str. 12/1, Moscow 109240, Russian Federation

    PhD in Philosophy, Research Fellow

Downloads

Published

2018-12-10

How to Cite

Revelation and the Science of Religion: Between Positivism and Postmodernism. (2018). Philosophy of Religion: Analytic Researches, 2(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.21146/2587-683X-2018-2-2-155-163